Diane Filion Center for
Advancing Faculty Excellence

Evidence Based Practice: Contract Menu Grading

Evidence Based Practice: Contract Menu Grading

Chris Madden

 

What is it? 

Contract grading entails a faculty member offering students a “menu” of assignments that are aligned with student learning outcomes.  Students then choose a pre-determined number of these assignments they would like to attempt for a grade.   

 

When to use it? 

It is essential that contract menu grading be outlined clearly in the syllabus from the beginning of the course.  This grading model could be effective when instructors envision myriad projects or assessment-types that would effectively demonstrate student learning.  

 

Summary of Technique 

 Contract menu grading offers an alternative means of evaluating student work compared to the traditional A-F letter grade system.  Because students are not required to complete all course assignments, they have more autonomy over the material they wish to explore further as well as the skills on which they would like to be evaluated.  While not requisite to the contract grading model, student self-assessments and self-reflections are often submitted along with assignments, thereby providing the instructor with another means of assessment. 

 

Links to Resources 

 What is Contract Grading from University of Nebraska – Lincoln 

Contract Grading Schemes from Ohio State University  

So Your Instructor is Using Contract Grading 

I Have Seen the Glories of the Grading Contract…And I’m Never Going Back 

 

Reference List 

 Grau, Harold J. “‘Streamlined’ Contract Grading—A Performance-Measuring Alternative to  

Traditional Evaluation Methods: Raising the Importance of Concept Mastery by  

Reducing the Emphasis on Grades.” Journal of College Science Teaching 28, no. 4  

(1999): 254–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42990676. 

 

Knapp, Christopher. “Assessing Grading.” Public Affairs Quarterly 21, no. 3 (2007): 275–94.  

http://www.jstor.org/stable/40441463. 

 

Stasz, Clarice. “Contract Menu Grading.” Teaching Sociology 4, no. 1 (1976): 49–66.  

https://doi.org/10.2307/1317088.